Professional Indemnity Insurance Reviewed

After extensive consultation and investigation, ASIC have completed their targeted review of Professional Indemnity Insurance (“PII”). 

Their extensive review was prompted, at least in part, by REP 459 “Professional indemnity insurance market for AFS licensees providing financial product advice” dated December 2015.

ASIC’s interest in PII was not purely academic. The Law requires that all AFS Licensees who provide financial services to retail clients must have adequate arrangements in place for compensating retail clients. In practice, this requires Licensees to maintain adequate PII unless an exemption applies or alternative arrangements have been approved by ASIC.

ASIC were concerned that many PII policies maintained by Licensees did not adequately address defence costs or cover fraud and dishonesty risks. ASIC were also concerned that PII policies are often complex and complicated, and, as a consequence, many Licensees didn’t (fully) understand the PII cover they had in place.

In our view, this highlights the need for licensees to deal with insurance brokers, like Greg Hansen, who specialise in this market.

There are two elements to consider when your PII next comes up for renewal: 

  1. Are ‘defence costs’ covered by your policy? Is it in addition to the minimum indemnity limit of $2 million? Alternatively, has your indemnity limit been sufficiently increased to take account of these costs?
  2. Are you covered for losses and claims that are the result of fraud and dishonesty? Are you clear how your policy defines “fraud and dishonesty”, how it will be applied and what is excluded from coverage?

All licensees should be familiar with Regulatory Guide 126 but, if you are a small licensee, it’s particularly important to ensure your cover satisfies ASIC’s expectations and addresses the commercial realities of the market in which you operate. 

Keep exploring

ASIC’s mortgage broker review: When compliance processes fail to protect consumers

October 14, 2026

ASIC’s mortgage broker review exposes weaknesses in loan recommendations, compliance monitoring and complaints handling. For credit licensees, the challenge is to show that compliance processes do more than satisfy procedural requirements: they identify conduct risks, support good consumer outcomes, and provide meaningful assurance to management.

AFCA’s reasonable care approach: insurance application risks for advisers and AFSL holders

October 12, 2026

AFCA's reasonable care approach highlights insurance application risks for financial advisers and AFSL holders. Learn how to strengthen application controls, preserve evidence and assess complaints involving inaccurate disclosures and declined insurance claims.

Subscribe

Every fortnight “Three Hit Tuesday” delivers thought leadership, considered analysis and insights that will help you improve your advice, more effectively manage your regulatory risks and make you better informed than your peers.

AS-Subscribe Form

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

We respect your privacy. We know everyone says that, but we promise that we won’t sell your contact details to dodgy telemarketers, spam your email or otherwise exploit your trust.

Step 1 of 8 - Your Role

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Assess your ASIC exposure

Answer a few targeted questions to identify where your compliance may not stand up under ASIC review.

Takes less than 2 minutes. No preparation required.

What best describes your role?