"Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest"
The Boxer, Simon & Garfunkle
Wholesale clients are often assumed to need less hand-holding than their retail counterparts.
But let’s be real: wholesale/sophisticated doesn’t always mean capable, financially-literate or astute, and advisers still need to maintain a strong compliance framework when dealing with these clients.
Sure, regulatory obligations are less stringent for wholesale clients, but that’s no excuse for a similar paper trail (or none at all). The reality is that all clients are retail until proven otherwise.
Most advisers determine wholesale status using the $2.5 million net assets test or the $250,000 income test. However, when it comes to SMSFs, ASIC has confirmed that a $10 million fund balance might be required. That’s quite a big jump and one that advisers must consider carefully when classifying SMSF clients as wholesale.
Let’s explore that position – because it might not match your understanding of the requirements.
The Corporations Act provides that a trustee of an SMSF will be classified as a retail client under the Corporations Act unless the fund holds net assets of at least $10 million at the time the service is provided. However, ASIC clarified in Media Release 14-191MR that, for example, where the trustee of an existing superannuation fund receives advice about how to invest the fund’s assets, ASIC will not take action if the adviser assesses the trustee’s wholesale status based on the general test (such as $2.5 million in net assets), rather than applying the $10 million SMSF threshold. ASIC will adopt a similar approach for trustees who subscribe to financial products on behalf of an existing fund.
This is awesome news, but don’t get too excited because this is where it gets tricky. Now, the file will have to support the decision to treat the client as wholesale, even though they may not meet the traditional test(s).
There isn’t always a clear-cut distinction between retail and wholesale advice. If an adviser starts delving into additional areas of circumstance and the complexity of the situation starts increasing, the wholesale classification might not hold up. Suddenly, that client needs the full suite of retail protections, and recognising when the line has been crossed is key—not just for compliance but also for client protection.
We’ve seen some advisers deal with their clients in both capacities, depending on the advice provided. If you asked Manny and I to answer in one word whether this could be done, it would be yes. If you asked Manny and me whether you should, then it depends…
- Can the file support the need for varying processes for a particular client?
- Are both pieces of advice reliant on each other, and if so, are they incorporated?
- Why would multiple pieces of advice be more beneficial for the client?
- Are the business processes strong enough to manage it ongoing?
Shake hands, and let’s have a good fight
In one of our recent articles—“Wholesale Client Tests: Reform at the Crossroads”—we explored the ongoing industry debate around ASIC’s shift toward a more conservative interpretation of wholesale client classifications (see https://www.assuredsupport.com.au/articles/wholesale-investors/). ASIC appears inclined to update and tighten requirements, and industry consensus is far from settled. We’ll continue to monitor developments and provide updates as the landscape evolves.
In the meantime, what does a well-structured wholesale financial planning advice file look like? Luckily, Manny (The Maestro) and Ben (B-52) are here to break it down. They mostly agree—but let’s just say they have their moments of friendly professional disagreement, and there have been a few water fountains knocked over during these ‘discussions’ in the past.
The Maestro takes a risk-based approach to most things. In his view, it’s all about mitigating risks and making the file ‘audit ready’. He’s diligent in his approach, double-checking all the locks before leaving the office, and has 2FA enabled on his Tesla.
The B-52 is much more process-driven and believes great advisers should always aim for best practice. He believes transparent and well-documented advice adds value to clients and promotes industry confidence.
Let’s hear from both of them on what should be in a wholesale file.
While their views are aligned, they do take different positions in some cases and offer different perspectives.
“What have I got to do to stay compliant?” Sorry seems to be the hardest word, Elton John
No low blows, kidney punches and rabbit punches
Maestro:
The law’s flexible and s761G can be used when you:
- provide advice on a product with a minimum investment of $500,000.
- Hold a certificate from a qualified accountant issued in the last 2 years, confirming net assets of $2.5 million and/or gross income of at least $250,000.
- can confirm the client’s investment experience,
- Can use the Sophisticated Investor Test. How this is done is up to the individual adviser. The Licensee’s risk appetite and guidance would be the first place to check, but advisers also need to ensure they are recording the correct information and that it is readily available.
B-52:
Manny is right. If we view the legal requirements, this is all that needs to be done. Considering the recent industry findings and publications, it would be best to go beyond these requirements. I would also record clear (and contemporary) file notes outlining the steps taken when confirming the client’s history and the appropriateness of the approach.
For example, if the client meets the asset test, how they obtained the assets is important. A windfall, or inheritance, does not necessarily mean they can go without the consumer protection mechanisms. Have the client sign something in writing. This should outline the differences and reasoning for the adviser’s approach. The client’s consent would be backed by discussions, making it informed. ASIC has confirmed they will not take action if a client does not have $10 million in their SMSF but is treated as a wholesale client. This is great, but ASIC would act if the adviser miscategorises the client to avoid retail obligations or where there is a complaint. In the absence of notes, either is hard to support.
Also, AFCA has confirmed that they will not “exclude complaints from wholesale clients merely because of their classification” (see AFCA Approach to Wholesale Clients and Jurisdiction, 2022: https://www.afca.org.au/news/insights/wholesale-clients-and-afca-jurisdiction). from wholesale clients…merely because a wholesale client submits it.” It is best to ensure the file is defendable and includes all relevant information regarding the process followed and the adviser’s professional judgment.
“History is so subjective. The teller of it determines it.” Lin-Manuel Miranda
There aint gonna be no rematch
B-52:
Advisers are generally exempt from having to provide specific documentation to a wholesale client (FSG, SOA PDS, etc.). This reduces administration requirements for the adviser and can be a better experience for the client, assuming they are a bona fide wholesale client. The law does not require these documents to be provided, but records are expected to be maintained to support the process and advice. This can be satisfied in several ways, as the law is flexible. Some advisers choose emails, whereas others choose notes and supporting documents. Again, this is a preference, but advisers can come undone when the approach isn’t structured, as things can be missed.
Maestro:
The law is flexible, but prison bars aren’t, and I would not suggest leaving these things to chance. I recommend providing the client with something in writing that outlines the relevant information. As Ben says, it may be via email (and doesn’t have to be an SOA), but if a complaint or information is requested, if nothing is provided, it’s the client’s word vs. the adviser’s. I recommend providing the client with an ‘advice document’ outlining:
- Relevant personal particulars.
- Objectives, asset allocation and investment rationale.
- Rationale for why products align with objectives and why the existing products are being replaced. •
- Cost-benefit analysis.
- If using complex products, such as structured investments or alternative assets, supporting explanations so the client understands the associated risks.
- Clear risks and lack of retail protection.
- Client acknowledgement and understanding.
- Disclosure of any conflicts of interest.
The Sweet Science
REP742, an ASIC report focusing on managing conflicts of interest in wholesale financial markets, highlights ASIC’s view. Whilst the obligations in dealing with wholesale clients are more relaxed, advisers still need to manage and disclose conflicts. If there is no evidence of something occurring, it didn’t happen. Conflicts need to be managed regardless of whether a client is retail or wholesale, and if the evidence on file is not supportive of the entire process, questions arise, and it’s best to avoid scrutiny. In RG181, ASIC confirms that “disclosure to clients is an adequate mechanism for controlling conflicts of interest” and that RG181 applies to retail and wholesale clients.
Other things to consider include the retention of detailed notes of client interactions and discussions—all email correspondence or records of phone conversations confirming the client’s agreement with the strategy. At the risk-focused level, a well-documented file is about mitigating regulatory risk and ensuring audit readiness. If the adviser is questioned, we need clear evidence that the client understood their classification and the associated risks. While regulatory compliance is crucial, the best-practice approach emphasises ensuring best-practice advice standards, even for wholesale clients. Just because the law does not mandate an SOA doesn’t mean we should skip thorough documentation and a robust client engagement experience.
In addition to meeting the minimum wholesale client classification criteria, we expect a thorough client profile, including their financial experience, investment goals, and risk tolerance. Documentation demonstrating that the adviser has considered whether treating the client as wholesale is genuinely in their best interests—a documented plan for ongoing client engagement. Adviser notes on how investment performance will be monitored and how often the adviser will check in with the client. Evidence that the adviser has discussed the importance of regular portfolio reviews, especially for complex investments.
The Roper-Doper
Best-practice compliance is about ensuring transparency, accountability, and client understanding. Even though wholesale clients do not require the same level of regulatory disclosures as retail clients, maintaining high advice standards reduces legal risks, enhances client relationships, and strengthens the adviser’s professional reputation.
Finding the Right Balance While both perspectives align on the importance of regulatory compliance, there are some differences regarding minimum expectations and better practices. We want to mitigate liability and avoid leaving things to chance. Defending advice takes time and money, and the steps taken early in the process will pay dividends later if there is a complaint or knock on the door from the Regulator. In reality, a strong wholesale financial planning advice file should incorporate elements of both perspectives—meeting regulatory obligations while ensuring best-practice documentation and client care.
Advisers who strike this balance will remain compliant and build long-term trust and credibility with their wholesale clients.
Talk to us if you need guidance on ensuring your wholesale advice files are compliant and best practice.
At Assured Support, we specialise in helping AFSL holders and financial advisers confidently meet their regulatory obligations. Whether you need a tailored compliance framework, an independent file review, or strategic compliance advice, our expert team is ready to support you. Let’s make your next audit a non-event—reach out today and take the next step toward audit readiness and client confidence.
If you enjoyed this, we recommend:
An Auditor’s View of Conflicted Advice (SMSF)
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is the difference between retail and wholesale clients in financial advice?
Retail clients are entitled to complete consumer protection under financial services laws, including access to detailed disclosures like FSGs and SOAs. On the other hand, wholesale clients are considered more financially sophisticated and are not entitled to the same level of regulatory disclosure. However, advisers must maintain a compliant and well-documented advice process, especially when dealing with borderline or complex client situations.
2. Can SMSF trustees qualify as wholesale clients under current ASIC guidelines?
Yes—but with caution. Under the Corporations Act, an SMSF trustee is classified as a retail client unless the fund has net assets of at least $10 million. However, ASIC’s 14-191MR allows some flexibility, stating that advisers may use general tests (like $2.5 million net assets) for existing SMSFs. Despite this, advisers must document their rationale thoroughly to remain audit-ready and compliant.
3. Is it acceptable to treat a client as retail and wholesale for different pieces of advice?
It can be done—but only if properly documented. Advisers must justify and support the decision through thorough record-keeping, including file notes and client acknowledgements. The advice must remain in the client’s best interest, and the adviser must demonstrate how the different advice types are managed independently yet cohesively within the compliance framework.
4. Do wholesale clients have the right to lodge complaints with AFCA?
Yes. The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) can still review complaints from wholesale clients. AFCA has explicitly stated that a client’s wholesale status alone does not exclude them from jurisdiction. Therefore, advisers must ensure that their advice files are defensible and include detailed records of the classification process and professional judgment used.
5. What should a compliant wholesale advice file include?
A best-practice wholesale advice file should include:
- Proof of wholesale client classification (e.g., accountant’s certificate)
- Clear client objectives and risk tolerance
- Investment rationale and cost-benefit analysis
- Disclosure of risks and limitations of retail protections
- Evidence of informed client consent
- Notes on ongoing engagement, review plans, and conflict management
Maintaining these records helps mitigate regulatory risk, especially in case of complaints or audits.
