FAQ

Can AI be used for compliance monitoring?

Yes. ASIC expects AFS licensees to maintain effective compliance monitoring and AI can be used to support that objective. AI may assist with surveillance, risk detection, file reviews, breach identification and data analysis, but human oversight remains required. Compliance accountability stays with the licensee and AI-generated findings should be reviewed before action is taken.

Expanded Answer

AI can be a valuable compliance tool when used within an appropriate governance framework. ASIC’s regulatory focus is on the effectiveness of compliance systems and controls rather than the specific technology used. AI can assist in identifying patterns, anomalies, conduct risks and potential compliance breaches across large volumes of data more efficiently than traditional manual processes.

In practice, AI may be used to monitor adviser conduct, review advice files, analyse communications, detect unusual transactions, identify potential reportable situations and support risk assessments. These tools can improve coverage and consistency, particularly where large datasets or complex monitoring activities are involved. However, AI outputs should be treated as indicators requiring further investigation rather than definitive compliance conclusions.

Key obligations:

  • Applies when AI is used within compliance, surveillance or risk management functions.
  • Human review remains required before compliance decisions are made.
  • Compliance accountability remains with the AFS licensee.
  • AI monitoring systems should be tested, validated and regularly reviewed for accuracy and effectiveness.

Regulatory scrutiny increases where firms rely heavily on automated monitoring without demonstrating appropriate governance, validation and oversight. Effective compliance frameworks combine technology with experienced compliance professionals who can interpret results and exercise judgement. For additional guidance, see AI-driven compliance: transforming risk management and regulatory oversight and The hidden risks of AI: ASIC’s review of licensees’ embrace of artificial intelligence.

Why it matters

Effective AI-assisted monitoring can improve risk detection, reduce manual effort and identify emerging issues earlier. Poorly governed systems can create false confidence, missed breaches and inadequate supervision, increasing regulatory and operational risk.

Unsure how this applies to you?

Get a clear answer in a 15-minute call with a compliance specialist. Book your call

Practical guidance

  • Validate AI monitoring tools before deploying them in compliance processes.
  • Review and investigate AI-generated alerts before making compliance decisions.
  • Track performance metrics and regularly test monitoring outcomes against actual risks.

Further reading

AI-driven compliance: transforming risk management and regulatory oversight

From samples to signals: a smarter approach to AFSL surveillance

Using technology to streamline compliance

Subscribe

Every fortnight “Three Hit Tuesday” delivers thought leadership, considered analysis and insights that will help you improve your advice, more effectively manage your regulatory risks and make you better informed than your peers.

AS-Subscribe Form

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

We respect your privacy. We know everyone says that, but we promise that we won’t sell your contact details to dodgy telemarketers, spam your email or otherwise exploit your trust.

Step 1 of 8 - Your Role

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Assess your ASIC exposure

Answer a few targeted questions to identify where your compliance may not stand up under ASIC review.

Takes less than 2 minutes. No preparation required.

What best describes your role?