FAQ

How quickly should I be able to produce compliance records?

ASIC does not prescribe a specific timeframe for producing compliance records. However, AFS licensees should be able to promptly locate and provide relevant compliance evidence when requested by regulators, auditors, responsible managers, or governance bodies. Records that cannot be efficiently accessed may indicate weaknesses in compliance infrastructure, oversight arrangements or record management processes.

Expanded Answer

The speed at which a licensee can produce compliance records often indicates the effectiveness of its compliance infrastructure. ASIC expects licensees to maintain adequate records that support compliance with their obligations and demonstrate how governance, monitoring, risk management and remediation activities operate in practice.

Compliance records should be accessible, reliable and sufficiently organised to support regulatory enquiries, internal reviews and governance oversight. Where records are dispersed across spreadsheets, emails, shared drives, or individual staff members, retrieving information can become difficult, time-consuming, and error-prone.

Key indicators:

  • Applies when governance, monitoring and remediation records can be located and produced efficiently.
  • Applies when responsible managers can access meaningful compliance information when required.
  • May indicate infrastructure weaknesses when records are fragmented or difficult to retrieve.
  • May indicate governance and oversight gaps when evidence of compliance cannot be readily produced.

The objective is not simply retaining records. The objective is to ensure compliance information remains accessible and capable of supporting oversight, decision-making, and regulatory readiness.

Why it matters

Delays in producing compliance records can affect governance oversight, regulatory responsiveness and operational efficiency. Organisations that can quickly access compliance evidence are generally better positioned to respond to ASIC enquiries, audits, investigations and internal reviews. Strong record accessibility is often a sign of a mature compliance infrastructure.

Unsure how this applies to you?

If you’re unsure whether your compliance infrastructure is fit for purpose, get a clear answer in a 15-minute call with a compliance specialist. Book your call.

Alternatively, explore [complyᵉ] to see how governance, monitoring, incidents, remediation and oversight can operate as a connected system.

Practical guidance

  • Test how long it takes to produce governance records, monitoring outcomes and remediation evidence from the previous 12 months.
  • Review whether compliance information is stored consistently and remains accessible to authorised personnel.
  • Assess whether responsible managers can obtain key compliance information without relying on individual staff members.

Further reading

What does a defensible compliance framework look like for AFSL and credit licensees?

Preparing for a compliance review: key considerations

Why compliance reporting matters for licensees

Subscribe

Every fortnight “Three Hit Tuesday” delivers thought leadership, considered analysis and insights that will help you improve your advice, more effectively manage your regulatory risks and make you better informed than your peers.

AS-Subscribe Form

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

We respect your privacy. We know everyone says that, but we promise that we won’t sell your contact details to dodgy telemarketers, spam your email or otherwise exploit your trust.

Step 1 of 8 - Your Role

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Assess your ASIC exposure

Answer a few targeted questions to identify where your compliance may not stand up under ASIC review.

Takes less than 2 minutes. No preparation required.

What best describes your role?