FAQ

What advice failures are consistently remediated in client files?

ASIC findings indicate AFS licensees most often remediate client files where there is weak linkage between client circumstances and advice, inadequate fact-finding, and insufficient documentation of the rationale for recommendations. These issues typically reflect failures to evidence the best interests process rather than isolated documentation gaps.

Expanded Answer
ASIC’s review outcomes consistently highlight deficiencies in how advice is evidenced on file. Common remediation areas include unclear or incomplete client objectives, missing or generic fact-finds, and limited documentation explaining why a strategy or product was recommended. Files often fail to demonstrate how the adviser moved from client information to a specific, suitable recommendation.

In practice, remediation frequently focuses on strengthening the advice narrative. This includes clarifying client goals, documenting key assumptions, and explicitly linking recommendations to client needs and constraints. Licensees are also required to address gaps in file notes, particularly where client discussions, risks, or trade-offs are not clearly recorded. ASIC expects that remediation goes beyond fixing individual files and addresses underlying process weaknesses.

Regulatory scrutiny increases where the same issues appear across multiple files, indicating systemic failures in advice processes or supervision. Practical remediation themes are reflected in A practical guide to high-level file reviews for licensees and advisers.

Why it matters
Recurring file deficiencies increase the risk of client remediation programs, AFCA disputes, and ASIC enforcement. Poor documentation can lead to adverse inferences that appropriate advice processes were not followed.

Practical guidance
Strengthen fact-finding to ensure client objectives, needs, and constraints are clearly captured and specific
Document the reasoning linking client circumstances to each recommendation, including key assumptions and trade-offs
Identify recurring file issues and update advice processes, templates, and training to address root causes

Further reading
Info 292: clear, captured and client-centric
How long is too long? Records of advice in practice

Subscribe

Every fortnight “Three Hit Tuesday” delivers thought leadership, considered analysis and insights that will help you improve your advice, more effectively manage your regulatory risks and make you better informed than your peers.

AS-Subscribe Form

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

We respect your privacy. We know everyone says that, but we promise that we won’t sell your contact details to dodgy telemarketers, spam your email or otherwise exploit your trust.

Step 1 of 8 - Your Role

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Assess your ASIC exposure

Answer a few targeted questions to identify where your compliance may not stand up under ASIC review.

Takes less than 2 minutes. No preparation required.

What best describes your role?