FSC Standard 31 changes how FSC member trustees oversee wrap superannuation platforms by shifting from static product governance to continuous, data-driven monitoring of investment menus, adviser and licensee behaviour, and advice fee deductions, with a focus on identifying patterns and risks across client cohorts.
Expanded Answer
FSC Standard 31 sets governance expectations for FSC member trustees operating wrap superannuation platforms across investment menus, adviser and licensee oversight, and advice fee controls. FSC expects trustees to maintain ongoing monitoring of both investments and platform usage, reinforcing that accountability remains with the trustee even where external providers or research are used.
FSC Standard 31 changes the unit of supervision from individual advice files to behavioural patterns across clients. Trustees are expected to use data to identify trends such as repeated product selection, portfolio concentration, or inconsistent advice fee deductions. This shifts oversight from point-in-time approvals to continuous assessment of how platforms are used in practice, requiring consistent and explainable patterns of advice behaviour.
FSC Standard 31 also raises expectations for initial due diligence and ongoing controls. Trustees must apply structured, evidence-based processes before admitting investments to platform menus and must ensure advice fee deductions from superannuation are lawful and properly authorised. This increases scrutiny where patterns suggest member risk or weak governance. See FSC Standard 31 and the rise of platform oversight.
Why it matters
FSC Standard 31 increases scrutiny on platform usage, not just product selection. Inconsistent portfolio construction, weak product governance, or poor fee controls are more likely to be detected as patterns, increasing the risk of platform intervention, remediation, and regulatory escalation.
Unsure how this applies to you?
Get a clear answer in a 15-minute call with a compliance specialist. Book your call
Practical guidance
- Standardise portfolio construction approaches so patterns across clients are consistent and defensible
- Strengthen product due diligence and APL governance to meet higher platform entry and monitoring expectations
- Implement controls to verify advice fee consent, legality, and audit evidence across all client cohorts
Further reading
From samples to signals: a smarter approach to AFSL surveillance
ASIC governance imperatives for 2026