FAQ

What’s the difference between an SMA and an SMA mandate?

ASIC treats an SMA as a managed account structure, while an SMA mandate is the investment rule set used within that structure. The distinction applies when an AFS licensee recommends, operates, or monitors a separately managed account for a client. The mandate is not the account; it defines how the account is managed.

Expanded Answer

A Separately Managed Account is an investment account or managed account service where the client’s portfolio is managed according to a model or strategy. ASIC recognises that industry terms such as SMA, IMA and MDA are not always used consistently. The regulatory classification depends on the features of the arrangement, not the label used.

An SMA mandate is the investment instruction set for that SMA. It sets the investment objective, asset universe, portfolio weights, exclusions, rebalancing rules and manager discretion. The AFS licensee and adviser assess whether the SMA and its mandate are appropriate for the client’s objectives, financial situation and needs.

Applies when: an adviser recommends a client invest through an SMA model or managed account structure.

Not the same thing: the SMA is the account or service; the SMA mandate is the investment strategy governing it.

ASIC’s MDA guidance is relevant where the arrangement gives discretion to manage client assets, because ASIC says products described as SMAs can have MDA features. ASIC also states that MDA providers need appropriate AFS licence authorisations.

Why it matters

Confusing the SMA with the SMA mandate creates advice, disclosure and supervision risk. AFS licensees must know whether they are approving a product, an investment model, a discretionary service, or all three. The wrong classification can affect licensing, documentation and monitoring obligations.

Unsure how this applies to you?

Get a clear answer in a 15-minute call with a compliance specialist. Book your call

Practical guidance

  • Classify whether the arrangement is an SMA, MDA, model portfolio, or product recommendation before advice is given.
  • Document the mandate’s objective, constraints, discretion and rebalancing rules in the client file.
  • Review whether the AFS licensee’s authorisations, APL approval and monitoring controls match the SMA arrangement.

Further reading

SMA or MDA? That is the question

A practical guide to Australian financial services licences

Do I really need discretion? MDA vs ROA advice models

Subscribe

Every fortnight “Three Hit Tuesday” delivers thought leadership, considered analysis and insights that will help you improve your advice, more effectively manage your regulatory risks and make you better informed than your peers.

AS-Subscribe Form

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

We respect your privacy. We know everyone says that, but we promise that we won’t sell your contact details to dodgy telemarketers, spam your email or otherwise exploit your trust.

Step 1 of 8 - Your Role

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Assess your ASIC exposure

Answer a few targeted questions to identify where your compliance may not stand up under ASIC review.

Takes less than 2 minutes. No preparation required.

What best describes your role?